Claim R-002.1 / Capability
CS / DEF / 001 · Preview 0.2
Abrasive blasting and marine protective coating application to ballast tanks and hull exteriors.
Recorded against record R-002 · marine coatings · Halifax, NS
Illustrative research preview
These are specimen records. Each is identified by a code, a container and a place rather than by a name, so that nothing here can be read as a finding about a real firm — and so that no code can collide with a real trading name.
What is real is the structure. Every claim carries the source it came from, the date that source was retrieved, the person who reviewed it, and a status from the published Evidence Vocabulary that says how far it can be relied on and what would move it. That structure is the product; these records are here to show it working, including where it has to say that nobody has checked something yet.
Evidence · 2 sources
- 01 Canadian Company Capabilities Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
CCC profile, "Products and services" section retrieved
“Abrasive blasting; industrial and marine coatings; tank linings.”
Evidence status: partial. Self-reported Declared by the supplier. Supports the claim; cannot establish it alone.
- 02 Supplier corporate publications The supplier
Supplier capability statement (PDF), p. 2 retrieved
“Ballast tank and void space coating to owner specification.”
Evidence status: partial. Self-reported Declared by the supplier. Supports the claim; cannot establish it alone.
- Reviewer
- Reviewer C (senior analyst) · not signed · status dated (source retrieved) Illustrative reviewer and date · specimen record
- Status
- Evidence status: partial. Supported over evidence partial
- Rationale
- Two self-declared sources agree; no independent source located yet.
- What would move it
- A contract record or an owner-side inspection report naming the firm.
Cite as
Capacity Signal, CS/DEF/001, Preview 0.2 (2026-08-18), claim R-002.1, status Supported. https://capacitysignal.ca/reports/cs-def-001/claims/r-002-1/
Stated limits
What this claim does not tell you
- 01
Absence from the register is not a negative finding.
The register was assembled from 6 open source classes. A firm that does not appear may simply not be described in those sources. Nomination is free and takes one form.
- 02
Award records establish that work was contracted, not that it was performed to standard.
Performance, delivery, and quality history are not in the open record. Contract history claims are graded on the award record alone.
- 03
Controlled goods content is excluded, permanently.
Only public registration status is recorded. Nothing about what a registrant makes, holds, or handles is collected, inferred, or stored.